May 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BOOKS

What do I know about anything?"
Claire Truscott talks to arch-muckraker Seymour Hersh about journalism, ethics and the Iraq War


Seymour Hersh is in an impatient mood. He got back from Italy an hour ago and the story he's been working on for the last month has come to nothing. So when he agrees to an interview it's with little grace: "And they want it now? For May? OK, well let's just do it quickly. Let's just do it."

The prize-winning journalist turned 68 last month and remains, as Spectator magazine describes, him: "America's deadliest investigative reporter." Recently, he wrote that US Special Forces were in Iran. Most famously, a year ago he revealed the full extent of torture by US military personnel at Abu Ghraib.

His first big break came 36 years ago. While freelancing, Hersh broke the story of the My Lai massacre in the Vietnam War, when US troops killed hundreds of unarmed civilians. Hersh knocked on door after door to piece together the events he chronicled in print. The story won him a Pulitzer and kick-started a career of investigations, revisited in several books, including most recently Chain of Command, in which Hersh traces responsibility for US prisoner abuses to the highest echelons of the Bush administration.

He is ambivalent about the fame that comes with it: "Right now, I do a lot of speeches because people want me to talk, and I've learned to do them because I make a lot of money and I'm a pain in the arse. I do it because in another three weeks something else will be in fashion." But right now he is not in the mood to wax lyrical. 'Oscar the Grouch' spends the next 25 minutes stone-walling my questions: "It's just too self-serving of a question," he says, while openly mocking others. "Do you confuse me with some sort of guru? What the fuck do I know about something?" he says, before proceeding to answer with such insight you're left wondering where the joke rests.

Ask Hersh what drives him in his endless pursuit of dirt and he says: "Are you kidding me? It's a great story!" His retorts are revealing. Hersh is no ideologue; he is a muckraker who goes in and gets the story. No guiding moral force, no Michael Moore-style rants. In fact, it is ideology he believes has got his government into this mess. "I joke that we have a Trotskyite president. He wouldn't know what it means, but Wolfowitz would. Yeah, of course it's dangerous. Any sort of... fanatic... but I think they believe it. They're not lies to the people who say them - I wish they were."

Teasingly suggesting it seems generous to acquit the government of manipulation, Hersh pounces: "I think you misunderstand me. When you really believe in something, that it's your fate in life to change the Middle East and bring democracy to Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, y'know, whether there's been democracy there or whether they want it... I think we'd be in much better shape if it was just a bunch of propaganda and manipulation and lying. That's not generosity, that's terrifying."

The feeling is mutual: leading neo-conservative Richard Perle has called Hersh "the closest thing American journalism has to a terrorist". But it wasn't always that way. Hersh told the Guardian: "The funny thing is I always liked Perle... We had a friendship, based on the fact that he's very smart." Does he think this kind of access to power helped make the muckraker? After all, he started out as an Army press officer and spent a brief time working for Congress. "Ha ha, you're talking to somebody who wrote home town press releases and speeches for a man running for the presidency. If you're thinking those things are 'access to power'... I've been to Perle's house. Who hasn't?" But change tack and Hersh tells you: "No no, you're giving up too easily on this, why do you give up so easily?"

With other fish to fry, the conversation moves to his trusted sources. Hersh's editors know all of his anonymous sources, but he has had his fair share of stings. In 1974 he accused the US ambassador to Chile of knowing about a CIA plot to overthrow president Salvador Allende and later had to print a retraction. In the mid-1990s he saw documents alleging that Marilyn Monroe had blackmailed JFK. By the time it was revealed that they were probably fake, the hype surrounding his 'scoop' had ensured professional embarrassment.

It's the nature of the beast for Hersh. "You have to understand that reporters like information, and we take it. That's part of the problem we have as journalists." What does he think of the BBC's promise, post-Hutton report, to insist on multiple sources? "That's all crazy, of course it's crazy. I shouldn't say it so flippantly. That doesn't solve anything. So, if somebody wants to con you he works twice as hard."

If his tendency to patronise his interviewer seems conceited, it belies a modesty and a sentimentality for his profession revealed when asked about his talent. "(Good journalism) has nothing to do with what I do - it's much more dependent on external events and values. You have a president who's off the wall. The fact that two weeks ago in the midst of all the hoopla, the Poles of all people pulled out (of Iraq) with no attention paid to them interests me." He regales the tale of his best article since My Lai, a 25,000-word piece accusing a US General of killing retreating troops in Iraq in 1991. "Nobody gave a shit. It was exhuming a series of atrocities that happened ten years earlier in a war everybody thought we'd won, and nobody could have cared less."

On the 'war on terror', Hersh takes the role of wisened old hack. "I think the idea that you had to go after Bin Laden with bombs rather than judicial writs is probably a mistake. Terrorism peaks and comes and goes, history's shown us that. I would have been much calmer about it. 9/11 was a horrible thing, and I can understand the overreaction. But it was an overreaction, and the problem is we can't correct it now."

The overreaction and ideology of the American administration continues, and Hersh is on its heels. He says there will be more on Iran. But his recent report also mentioned several North African states. "I think North Africa's very interesting, as you raise it. I think we're doing a lot more there than people know... Intelligence operations and operational stuff going on." Special Forces? Covert Ops? "I didn't say that."
And with that final grumble Hersh hangs up. And we are done.

Seymour Hersh, Concert Hall, Brighton Dome, May 25, 7.30pm, £6-10. Tel 01273 709709. Chain of Command (Penguin) is out in paperback from May 26, priced £7.99.

Tickets 01273 709709 or www.brighton-festival.org.uk







copyright The Insight 2005



| Home | Eating Out | Films, Books, Music | Listings |
| Astrology | Health | About Us | Subscription | Contact Us |